In a certain sense the central idea of Difference and Repetition can be summed up reasonably quickly. A philosophical masterpiece whose implications for how we view the world have not yet been either fully felt or understood. will find this work challenging and antagonizing. Finally! While difference implies divergence and decentering, repetition is associated with displacement and disguising. Yet it is also a work not yet entirely at home as a mere historical document – in other words, as something typically read in order to rediscover an epoch rather than approach the present … A bit repetitive but very intense. Well, if you're looking for me to explain Deleuze for you, no. Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition book. His overturning of traditional Western views. However, this ‘Everything is equal!’ and ‘Everything returns!’ can be said only at the point in which the extremity of difference is reached. I have read Bergson before (Matter and Memory) and did understand the points that were brought into the classical discussion of pure difference and complex repetition. Repetition is a related term of repeat. Deleuze criticizes the comparison on a representative basis and points out that the work does not begin with solving the problem, but with the formulation, the formation of this problem. Spine may show signs of wear. It is a book with far more similarities with a German Idealist tome than anything else, other than perhaps Heidegger's Being and Time. Since its publication in 1968, Difference and Repetition, an exposition of the critique of identity, has come to be considered a contemporary classic in philosophy and one of Gilles Deleuze's most important works. in chapter 2, he gives the dark counsel that. C'est difficile. by Deleuze, Gilles. There’s no way I could have gotten through it without a lot of help from commentaries and on-line synopsis. I received an e-mail from Goodreads saying that your official adult site www.meetpof.com is now following me. It's kind of like pulling the rug out from under traditional philosophical thought (referred to within as the "Image of Thought,") or more accurately to say that there was never a rug or a floor underneath any of it to start with. Not quite as interesting as Deleuze's Logic of Sense. And that's what I love about Deleuze, he rarely beats anyone up rowdy style. Deleuze's Difference and Repetition by Henry Somers-Hall is great. … Be the first to ask a question about Difference and Repetition. For millennia thinkers have posited the eternal question: "Can we make philosophy even more inaccessible?" Head in the clouds critical theory at its best. D&R is a fascinating, impossible work of authentic philosophy. Successfully defended in 1969 as Deleuze's main thesis toward his Doctorat d'Etat at the Sorbonne, the work has been central in initiating the shift in French thought away from Hegel and Marx, towards Nietzsche and Freud. Difference and Repetition is a megaton bomb exploding in Twentieth-Century philosophy. Rather, it implies between successive presents non-localisable connections, actions at a distance, systems of replay, resonance and echoes, objective chances, signs, signals, and roles which transcend spatial locations and temporal successions.”, “A single and the same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple, a single and the same ocean for all the drops, a single clamor of being for all beings: on condition that each being, each drop, and each voice has reached the state of excess - in other words, the difference which displaces and disguises them and, in turning upon its mobile cusp, causes them to return.”. Difference and Repetition serves as a revaluation of the way in which the multiplicity of forces in nature are categorized and evaluated. Two commentators, in particular, helped me through the tome: Joe Hughes’s reader guide did a good job of contextualizing Deleuze’s arguments in relation to those of his predecessors- particularly Kant and Husserl. will find this work challenging and antagonizing. In the proposed study, I summarize the key ideas from the materials that helped me understand the meaning of Difference and Repetition of Deleuze. Repetition and Parallelism can be a tricky area in literature. Even more helpful was Benjamin D. Hagen’s wonderful blog, Sketching a Present, which offers a (very) slow reading of Difference and Repetition’s particularly impenetrable opening two sections. FREE Shipping. But, on the other hand, there was an attempt at a very serious-minded, continental-flavored empiricism, flawed as it was. The book of antonyms could have been half in size, but its girth did help me squash a mozzie. The text follows the development of two central concepts, those of pure difference and complex repetition. As nouns the difference between repetition and repeat is that repetition is the act or an instance of repeating or being repeated while repeat is an iteration; a repetition. Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. After all, most philosophy begins as bizarre and inaccessible. Well, if you're looking for me to explain Deleuze for you, no. This book was a revelation for me, an expression of philosophical truths I had been struggling to express for a very long time. English. As nouns the difference between repetition and revision is that repetition is repetition while revision is revision, change. Like. repetition . Despite his infamous boast of having ejaculated in Kant's rectum, it seems to me that Deleuze made his home completely within the history of philosophy. Scholars of Nietszche, Leibniz, Hegel, Kant et al. Welcome back. What to expect? Not sure what rating to give this text. It's long. Early Deleuze's eclectic style is put on display as he writes with ease through several competing discourses, synthesizing Freud, Spinoza, Marx, and Nieztsche as if they are all equally correct in their assertions. Difference and Repetition, a brilliant exposition of the critique of identity, has come to be considered a contemporary classic in philosophy and one of Deleuze's most original works. And I'm not challenging anyone--I don't even like it. Richter didn’t publish the film during his lifetime because he thought it ‘resembles’ reality too much. Not quite as interesting as Deleuze's Logic of Sense. I hope Hagen considers completing his slow-reading as a book, although it would probably have to be 1000-plus pages. Instead it's a violent confrontation with an impossibly chaotic and complex reality. This book contains the core of Deleuze's thought and is the most coherent and direct statement of his philosophical ideas which would later be put to use in his collaborations with Felix Guattari. "Deleuze's 'Difference and Repetition': A Reader's Guide" offers a concise and accessible introduction to this hugely important and yet notoriously demanding work. In its explication the work moves deftly between Hegel, Kierkegaard, Freud, Althusser, and Nietzsche to establish a fundamental critique of Western metaphysics. A clandestine passenger on a motionless voyage. Pages may … Reading this book has made me enthusiastic to read more Nietzsche, especially “Will to Power” and “Thus spoke Zarathustra”, even though I have read both books before. Ultimately, then, Difference and Repetition will show that the individuation of entities is produced by the actualization, integration, or resolution (the terms are synonymous for Deleuze) of a differentiated virtual field of Ideas or “multiplicities” that are themselves changed, via “counter-effectuation,” in each individuating event.